COMPARISON BETWEEN ULTRASOUND, CYTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY RESULTS OF GROUP III AND V THYROID LESIONS ACCORDING TO THE BETHESDA SYSTEM 2018


Authors

  • Tấn Nguyễn Như Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Vũ Nguyễn Hồng Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Tỉnh Nguyễn Đức Bệnh viện Quân y 175

Keywords:

Thyroid nodules, TIRADS

Abstract

Objective: Determine the relationship between ultrasound, cytological and his­topathological characteristics of group III and V thyroid lesions.

Subjects and Study methods: The cross-sectional and retrospective descriptive study was performed on 74 diagnosed cases of thyroid cytology as group III, V at the Department of Pathology, 175 Military Hospital from September 2019 to May 2020 with results of thyroid ultrasound and histopathological results.

Results: The comparison of suspect features on ultrasound with histopathologi­cal results found that the features height greater than width had the highest malignancy rate. At the same time, the difference in TIRADS resolution of thyroid nodules on ultra­sound between the two groups with benign and malignant histopathological results was statistically significant (p <0.05). Comparing the cytological results with histopathol­ogy shows that the malignancy rate of group V and III thyroid nodules is quite high (82.1% and 66.7%). In the group of benign histopathology, the folicullar thyroid ad­enoma accounts for about 50%, this type of lesion is indicated for surgery. Comparison ultrasound with cytology and histopathology showed that the thyroid nodules TIRADS 5 and diagnosis of group V cytology had the highest malignancy rate (59.44%).

Conclusions: Surgery indications for thyroid nodules should be considered with a diagnosis of group III cytology.

References

Nguyễn Thị Phương Loan (2011). Khảo sát đặc điểm hình ảnh nhân giáp trên siêu âm đối chiếu với hình thái tế bào học, Luận văn Thạc sĩ y học, Đại học Y dược TP Hồ Chí Minh.

Nguyễn Trần Bảo Song, Đặng Công Thuận, Lê Trọng Lan và cộng sự (2020). “Giá trị của hệ thống phân loại Bethesda trong chẩn đoán tế bào học tuyến giáp”, Tạp chí Y học lâm sàng, số 61, tr.84- 87.

Nguyễn Thị Thu Thảo, Ngô Lê Lâm, Vũ Đăng Lưu (2019). “Nghiên cứu giá trị chẩn đoán ung thư tuyến giáp của phân độ EU- TIRADS 2017”, Tạp chí Điện quang, số 33, tr.12- 17.

Lê Thị Hồng Vũ, Phạm Thị Khánh Lê, Nguyễn Phước Bảo Quân (2018). “Đánh giá các thương tổn dạng nốt tuyến giáp theo phân độ TIRADS 2017”, Tạp chí Điện quang, số 29, tr.81- 86.

Edmund S. Cibas, Syed Z. Ali (2018). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 2nd edition, Springer, New York.

Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, et al. “Multiinstitutional Analysis of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. (2017)”, American Journal of Roentgenology, 208 (6): pp.1331-1341.

Yoo MR, Gweon HM, Park AY, Cho KE, Kim J-A, Youk JH, et al (2015). Repeat Diagnoses of Bethesda Category III Thyroid Nodules: What To Do Next? PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130138.

Abstract View: 17
PDF Downloaded: 2

Published

07-06-2024

How to Cite

Nguyễn Như, T., Nguyễn Hồng, V., & Nguyễn Đức, T. (2024). COMPARISON BETWEEN ULTRASOUND, CYTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY RESULTS OF GROUP III AND V THYROID LESIONS ACCORDING TO THE BETHESDA SYSTEM 2018. Journal of 175 Practical Medicine and Pharmacy, (26), 8. Retrieved from https://tapchi.benhvien175.vn/yduocthuchanh175/article/view/109