KIẾN THỨC, THÁI ĐỘ, THỰC HÀNH SBAR TRONG BÀN GIAO CA TRỰC CỦA NHÂN VIÊN Y TẾ TẠI BỆNH VIỆN ĐẠI HỌC Y DƯỢC THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH CƠ SỞ 2

Thị Kim Quyên Nguyễn; Anh Tuấn Trần; Thị Tâm Đan Phan; Ngọc Lâm Tuyền Trương; Thị Thanh Giúp Võ; Thị Xuân Hồng Nguyễn; Thụy Khánh Linh Trần

doi:10.59354/ydth175.2022.15

Keywords:

Shift to shift bedside handover, SBAR

Abstract

Objectives: Survey on nurses’ and midwives’knowledge, attitude and practice of applying SBAR handover tool at University Medical Center of Ho Chi Minh City - Branch 2.

Subject and Method: A cross-sectional study included 34 nurses and midwives who directly take care of patients in clinical departments of the hospital; each was observed for two chances of handover.

Results: The average score of SBAR knowledge in shift-to-shift bedside handover ranged from 3.7/5 to 3.8/5. The average of SBAR attitude score in shift-to-shift bedside handover of medical staffs ranged from 3.5/5 to 4.1/5. The average SBAR practice score is 8.8/12

Conclusion: Nurses and midwives have a good knowledge and positive attitude onapplying SBAR handover tool. Among the steps of SBAR practice, the good practice score was respectively high on Assement (A); situation (S); background (B); recommendation (R). The average score of midwives’ knowledge and attitude of nurses was higher than of midwives; the highest score is from Department of General Surgery and the lowest is from Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

References

Huỳnh Thị Kiều Diễm, Trần Thụy Khánh Linh (2019), “Mức độ tuân thủ SBAR trong bàn giao ca trực của điều dưỡng tại khoa cấp cứu và các yếu tố liên quan”, Khóa luận tốt nghiệp Điều dưỡng 2019, pp. 32-33.

Bộ Y Tế. (2014), Tài liệu đào tạo liên tục an toàn người bệnh, B, Editor.

Clark E., Squire S., Heyme A., et al. (2009), “The PACT Project: improving communication at handover”, Med Journal Aust, 190 (S11), pp. S125-7.

Wang W., Liang Z., Blazeck A., et al. (2015), “Improving Chinese nursing students’ communication skills by utilizing video-stimulated recall and role-play case scenarios to introduce them to the SBAR technique”, Nurse Educ Today, 35 (7), pp. 881-7.

Achrekar M., Murthy V., Kanan S., et al. (2016), “Introduction of Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation into Nursing Practice: A Prospective Study”, 3 (1), pp. 45-50.

Cooper D., Clark P. C. (2020), “Preliminary Psychometrics of the Knowledge and Attitudes Toward SBAR Instrument (KA-SBAR)”, Journal Dr Nurs Pract, 13 (2), pp. 120-124.

Cairns L. L., Dudjak L. A., Hoffmann R. L., et al. (2013), “Utilizing bedside shift report to improve the effectiveness of shift handoff”, Journal Nurs Adm, 43 (3), pp. 160-5.

Renz S. M., Boltz M. P., Wagner L. M., et al. (2013), “Examining the feasibility and utility of an SBAR protocol in long-term care”, Geriatr Nurs, 34 (4), pp. 295-301.

Zakeri H., Ahmadi F., Rafeemanesh E., et al. (2017), “The knowledge of hand hygiene among the healthcare workers of two teaching hospitals in Mashhad”, Electron Physician, 9 (8), pp. 5159-5165.

Truong A. T. T., Nguyen A. T. T., Pham H. T., et al. (2020), “The effectiveness of “I PASS The BATON” model in improving nursing handover at a university hospital in Vietnam”, 4 (3), pp. 1-5.

Yu M., Kang K. J. I. J. B.-S. B.-T. (2015), “SBAR report competency and communication clarity of handover in Korean nursing students”, 7 (6), pp. 189- 200.