KHÂU XUYÊN VÁCH NGĂN TRONG PHẪU THUẬT CHỈNH HÌNH VÁCH NGĂN TẠI BỆNH VIỆN ĐẠI HỌC Y DƯỢC TP.HỒ CHÍ MINH - CƠ SỞ 2

Thị Cẩm Lệ Âu; Quốc Bảo Phan; Huy Hùng Võ; Nhựt Thiên An Võ; Thị Tâm Đan Phan; Thị Thanh Giúp Võ; Thị Bích Đào Trịnh; Thị Thanh Duyên Huỳnh

doi:10.59354/ydth175.2022.57

Keywords:

septum deviation, septoplasty, septal trans-suture fixation

Abstract

Objective: Evaluating the outcome of nasal septum and obstruction symptom after septoplasty by modified septum trans-suture fixation technique.

Methods: Case series.

Results: Surveying 56 cases septoplasty by modified septum trans-stitch technique: the average age is 42.5±11.2 (from 22 to 64 years old); males are 35 cases (62.5%), females are 21 cases (37.5%). All cases have nasal obstruction; one-side obstruction are 19 cases (33.9%), both-side obstruction are 20 cases (35.7%) and obstruction accompanying chronic rhinosinusitis without surgical intervention are 17 cases (30.4%). The average illness-time is 2.8±1.2 year (from 1 to 5 years). The average screening-time is 14±5 month (from 9 to 22 months). Straight septum are 38/56 cases (67.8%), mild-deviation are 18/56 cases (32.2%); nasal obstruction symptom is significantly reduced; statistically significant better change in each group. The result shows: good-group are 44 cases (78.6%), moderate-group are 11 cases (19.6%), average-group is 1 case (1.8%), not recording complication in and after surgery.

Conclusions: Septal trans-suture fixation technique shows good result in simple septum deviation group, moderate result in septum deviation with enlarge inferior turbinate group, average result in septum deviation with CRS symptom.

References

Behroz G, Akbar B, Tayebe K (2010), “Outcomes of septoplasty in young adults: the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness study”, American Journal of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Vol 31, pp 189–192.

Hui L, Min W, Yu-Xiao W (2017), “Nasal septum suture combined with inferior turbinate coblation after septoplasty: Does it improve quality of life and reduce complications?”, World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 3, pp 44-48.

Jiro I, Takeshi M, Shun K (2020), “A new “J septoplasty” technique for correction of mild caudal septal deviation”, Auris Nasus Larynx, Vol 47, pp 79–83.

Leandro C, Lisandra M, Romualdo S (2011), “Assessment of symptom improvement following nasal septoplasty with or without turbinectomy”, Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, Vol77, pp 577- 83.

Maria T.B, Sandra A, Nuno B.L (2013), “Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study”, Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, Vol 79, pp 471-4.

Massimiliano G, Valeria D, Matteo B (2019), “Endoscopic septoplasty as a routine approach: Our experience on 647 patients”, Journal of Cranio-Maxillo- Facial Surgery, Vol 47, pp 1530-1534.

Radhika H.S, Sanjana V.N,Kiran J.S (2020), “Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients”, World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 6, pp 53-58.

Samarei R, Mabarian S (2020), “A randomised trial comparing the subjective outcomes following septoplasty with or without inferior turbinoplasty”, European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases, Vol xxx, pp xxx– xxx.

Su J.K, Dong S.C, Myoung S.C (2019), “Efficacy of nasal septal splints for preventing complications after septoplasty: A meta-analysis”, American Journal of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Vol 87, pp 433-438.

Vahit M (2019), “A novel surgical technique: Crushed septal cartilage graft application in endonasal septoplasty”, Auris Nasus Larynx, Vol 46, pp 218–222.